It is the rule of justice in whole world, that when a court award punishment to any individual, he can appeal to another superior court. And the rule for superior court is to be no judge from the previous court. The judge should be another person, not who have already awarded punishment.
But look at the attitude of ICC in match fixing issue of Pakistani players. ICC has appointed again Michael Beloff as head of tribunal for hearing of appeal, who has already been rejected appeal of the players once. Is this attitude is according to the rule of justice. Is there no other competent gentleman to whom ICC can appoint? Why ICC is doing controversial decisions. This attitude will give a chance to critic to put various question regarding the character of ICC.
So, therefore, ICC has to reconsider his decision and has to appoint other gentlemen for hearing the appeal of suspended Pakistani players. Otherwise the image of ICC will became more controversial as it is already damaged because of some bias statement of CEO of ICC Haroon Lorgat.
ICC wants to distroy pakistani team they all joelus from pakistani bolling
ReplyDeleteattack