Negative Role of Sri Lanka in ICC Rotation Policy

According to media reports, it was South African vote which prevent ICC from changing the rotation policy for Presidentship of ICC. South Africa cost her vote alongwith Pakistan and Bangladesh against changing the existing policy which prevented ICC from doing so on the spot. Surprisingly Sri Lankan board remained neutral.

It is obvious fact that during past 3 decades England and Australia dominated ICC decisions and therefore, to counter injustice policy from these two countries Asian block played significant role and make these two countries to share the management and other issues with other test playing countries. But after getting a strong position in ICC by the help of Asian block, India is now on the same domination policy of Australia and England. India is now dictating her terms on the power of money as she is largest financial supporter ICC.

Desire of amendment in  ICC rotation policy is a part of domination policy of these three (India, Australia and England) boards. These three boards want to preside ICC one after another for ever. There is no chance for any other board to get presidentship by any means in absence of rotation policy. These three boards can do it by power of money and mutual understanding. This time South African vote prevented them, but Sri Lankan board attitude was disappointing. It is look like Sri Lankan board is acting like a puppet in the hands of BCCI for some financial reasons.

There is a need for other 7 cricket playing nations to prevent these 3 boards from controlling ICC on the power of money. These 7 boards should prevent the remaining 3 by power of vote from doing so. These 7 boards should make sure to get equal share in management of ICC on the principle of equality for the betterment of cricket.

BCCI Proposed UDRS System

BCCI is against use of new technology in cricket, therefore BCCI has come with a very pragmatic proposal which will help to correct the disputed decisions from umpires, the main features of BCCI proposed UDRS are as following:-

In case of LBW appeal, to judge the swing of a delivery ICC should acquire the services of snake catcher (Sapera). Because these snake catcher have massive experience in catching swinging snakes. So therefore, they can judge the delivery correctly and can tell the umpires was the ball going to hit the stumps or not.

To judge the close catches, like, was the ball touching the ground before fielder take it or not, ICC should employee some monkeys.  Because these monkeys have large experience in jumping, climbing and catching the fruits like Coconuts, apples and oranges in jungles.

In case of appeal for caught behind, to judge was it an edge or not, ICC has to employee some cats. As we know that these cats have large experience in judging the foot voices of a coming person towards kitchen. So using this experience, a cat sitting near to the stumps can conform the edges.

According to BCCI,  the essential step towards improving standard of umpiring, ICC should throw ISI agents like Steve Buckner and Darrell Harper from ICC elite panel. ICC should have a very close watch on the performance of Aleem Dar, Asad Rauf and some Sri Lankan umpires. In case of any bed decision against Indian players on the advice of ISI, ICC should cancel the contract of these umpires immediately. ISI can also try to buy some Indian umpires as according to Indian movies ISI has done it with most of Indian politicians, but in this case ICC has no right to take action against these Indian umpires, BCCI will handle these umpires through Sani Deval and Ajay Devgan by themselves.

All the members countries should support BCCI because being a main financial supporter of ICC, the brain of BCCI are superior than others.

India Deserves Domination in ICC

In this commercial world every department of life has been commercialized throughout the world. Commercialism in sports is on peak. Organizers of every sports event want to earn as much money as they can. The game of cricket which is very popular in subcontinent is also on the way of commercialism. As founder of this game in past few decades England and Australia were controlling its functioning. But after economic development in India, the journey of commercialism of cricket started. Most of money involved in cricket now-a-days belongs to India.  Playing one series against India can change the economic position of a cricket board in few days. Besides Indian players, players of other countries are also making money through IPL which is a domestic event of India. So, if most of the money involved in cricket now-a-days belongs to India, and only money is requirement of cricket boards now-a-days, why India should not dominate the cricket matters in ICC meetings.

 If India is not happy with UDRS, other boards should respect Indian feelings and should not stress on implementation of this system because being largest financial supporter of ICC, India deserve to get positive results through pressurizing umpires as she did with Steve Buknor and Darell Harper.

If Darell Harper has made Indians unhappy, the other boards should support Indian desire of removing him from umpiring in future, because making unhappy a large financial supporter of ICC is a crime. 

If India want to prevent the way of Pakistan and Bangladesh to nominate candidate for ICC Presidentship, the other boards should support India, what the other boards have to do with Pakistan and Bangladesh, after all India is a large financial supporter of ICC.

If any Indian player like Suresh Raina has been seen with bookies, cricket fans should not mind it and should not criticize ICC for not taking action, after all India is large financial supporter of ICC.

If India does not want to include Pakistani domestic champion team into Champions League, Pakistan should not protest and should respect India desires to throw her from International cricket, after all India is largest financial supporter of ICC.

If India wants to change the rotation policy of ICC for Presidentship of ICC and want to stay President for ever, the remaining boards should support India in doing so, because India deserve it as she is strong financial supporter of ICC.

In conclusion I would like to say that all the charm in the cricket grounds is because of India now-a-days, so cricket playing countries should give powers to India to change the constitution according to her desires any time and should also allow her to change the umpires to whom she unlike on the spot in on going match. After all India is largest financial supporter of ICC.